Friday, December 27, 2019
Social Expectations in Story of an Hour and Sorrowful Woman Free Essay Example, 1500 words
A Critical Analysis of Social Expectation in ââ¬Å"The Story of an Hourâ⬠and ââ¬Å"A Sorrowful Womanâ⬠Introduction On the surface level, both Kate Chopinââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"the Story of an Hourâ⬠and Gail Goldwinââ¬â¢s story, ââ¬Å"A Sorrowful Womanâ⬠deal with the protagonistsââ¬â¢ reactions to what the society expects from them. The protagonistsââ¬â¢ codes of behavior do not necessarily comply with the societyââ¬â¢s expectation. Obviously the social expectation in both stories is inherently and intrinsically patriarchal. Therefore, Chopinââ¬â¢s and Goldwinââ¬â¢s protagonistsââ¬â¢ reactions to their loving and caring husbands seem to be confusing and eccentric. But a deeper analysis of the two stories will necessarily reveal that the protagonists are not antagonistic to their husbands in a real sense; rather they are in conflict with their societiesââ¬â¢ patriarchal expectation. They appear to be in conflict with a society that expects and teaches a woman to assume a role, subordinate and subservient to men, in the name of loyalty. Also such patriarchic expectations maim their freedom irrevocably. In both stories, the protagonistsââ¬â¢ husbands are apparently innocent, loving, caring and infallible. But the only plausible reason that underlies the protagonistsââ¬â¢ contained detest for their husbands is that these characters are intrinsically the symbol as well as the representative of the trammeling restriction of a male dominated society. We will write a custom essay sample on Social Expectations in Story of an Hour and Sorrowful Woman or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Social Expectations in ââ¬Å"A Sorrowful Womanâ⬠Both Goldwinââ¬â¢s and Chopinââ¬â¢s stories deal with the inherent patriarchy of the institution of marriage. Even the kindest and most loving husbandââ¬â¢s presence in a womanââ¬â¢s life can be as oppressive as the unswerving patriarchic social expectation is. An astute reader will discover that Goldwinââ¬â¢s anonymous heroine seems to be subconsciously tired of the environment in which she lives. Obviously this environment is an indispensable construct of Goldwinââ¬â¢s patriarchal society. A womanââ¬â¢s obligation to follow the code of conduct obviously is determined by the societyââ¬â¢s generic male expectation from a woman. Indeed this obligation of a woman to fulfill the male expectation comes up embroidered with a set moral demand. Therefore, a womanââ¬â¢s confinement within the four-walls of her husbandââ¬â¢s house is considered to be female loyalty and virtue. When the husband in Goldwinââ¬â¢s story addresses the protagonist as a ââ¬Å"clois tered queenâ⬠, his speech ironically refers to the invisible imprisonment of the protagonist: ââ¬Å"You look. . . like a cloistered queenâ⬠(Goldwin 23). This prison is invisibly built around a woman in Goldwinââ¬â¢s society through the male social expectations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.