Finding Darwin's God Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Finding Darwin's God - Assignment Example Miller holds the point that thought scientist might explain their understanding of the Universe in terms of the quantum physics theories; however, every theory has its influence from the supreme creator called God.   Quantum theory of physics observes the Universe as a combination of smallest or discreet parts such as atoms, nuclei, and subnuclear parts. Miller observes that these discreet particles, when combined in a random fashion, might have chances to result in unpredictable happenings in the world. In other words, the microscopic particles identified by quantum physics would combine to end up in macroscopic events; this unpredictability, Miller calls as the central property of matter. On the other hand, God, who created innumerable things in the same way as the combination of discreet particles influence the world with unpredictable events. Miller’s argument tries to build strong logical compatibility between the quantum theory, the evolution made by God, in terms of u npredictability, Miller seems to have maintained an acceptable logical statement that science and religion have unpredictable things in common. This could be understood in with the help of many events, which has happened in the course of years. If the scientists could consider the first report of Tsunami, Katherina and various tremors occurrences as unpredictable, then the same could also be argued in terms of some supernatural influence holding the earth. In this sense, Miller wins his argument.  Miller observes that creationists have the belief that natural science ends up with supernatural conclusions, but he differentiates religion and natural science clearly. There exists meaning for everything made by God and hence his creation holds his identity, so there is nothing-logical present in evolution and thus they believe that there is God argues creationists whereas evolutionists argue that there is logical reasoning for everything in the world.

Unit 3 Introduction to American Court System Essay

Unit 3 Introduction to American Court System - Essay Example Moreover, this system declines a hierarchical model of searching justice and favors the coordinate model (Dammer & Albanese, 2010). The coordinate model exercised by this system divides authority for developing, giving evidence and deciding on the verdict. This division checks power among the eventual decision makers. Therefore, this system manifests the public’s sovereignty, eliminates government abuse, and finally averts lawyers’ abuse. The rule of evidence incorporated by this system has an overall effect on the capacity of the system to identify truth because of delay. Subjection of both parties on the same formalities results to scant comfort. This will not guarantee a fair result because it is inadequate at the conceptual level (Leo, 2009). Moreover, inequality amid the parties leads to unjust advantage for the trial because the rules of evidence support the accused. This system is also deficient because of its inequality. This is because substantial responsibility is within the power of the lawyers for the accused. This is a weakness of this system because there is no representation for the accused. Conclusively, this system requires a neutral fact seeker. It encourages the contrasting sides to search and present their most persuasive evidence. However, the fact seeker is forbidden from making judgments before winding up the